Jaime Perez-Enriquez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
383 F.3d 994·2004 WL 2002567·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18993
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 200403-70244California1,999 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

Jaime Perez-Enriquez, petitioner, contends that he may not be remóVed as an alien who was inadmissible at the time of his adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(A) because his adjustment of status took place on the date he applied for lawful permanent residence, Wq, however, defer to the Attorney General’S'position that Perez-Enriquez’s adjustment of status for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(A) did not occur until his immigration status was adjusted to lawful permanent resident. As petitioner does not contest that he was inadmissible on this later date, his petition for review is dismissed.

I

Jaime Perez-Enriquez is a citizen and native of Mexico. On or about November 10, 1988, he was granted temporary resident status under the Special Agricultural Workers (“SAW”) provisions of § 210 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1160 . On December 1, 1990, his temporary lawful status was automatically adjusted to that of a lawful permanent resident pursuant to that section. Id. § 1160(a)(2)(B).

On February 27, 1989, when Perez-Enriquez was 18 years old, he pled guilty to the crime of Possession of Narcotic Controlled Substance for Sale, in violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.