Motley v. Parks

Good Law
383 F.3d 1058·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19581
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 200402-56648California12,907 words

Opinion

Opinion

383 F.3d 1058 Darla MOTLEY; Juan Jamerson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernard PARKS; Daryl Gates; Gerald Chaleff; Herbert Boeckman; T. Warren Jackson; Robert M. Talcott; Raymond C. Fisher; Guadalupe Sanchez; Gregory Kading; Al Ruegg; James Black; Lawrence Webster; Dean Hansell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-56648. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2004. Filed September 21, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Stephen Yagman, Marion R. Yagman, Joseph Reichmann, Kathryn S. Bloomfield, Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann, for plaintiffs-appellants Darla Motley and Juan Jamerson. Rockard J. Delgadillo, Los Angeles City Attorney and Janet G. Bogigian, Los Angeles Deputy City Attorney for defendants-appellees Bernard Parks, Daryl Gates, Gregory Kading, and Albert Ruegg. Robert F. Helfand, Elizabeth A. Keech, Deputy Attorneys General, State of California for defendant-appellee Guadalupe Sanchez. David Pinchas, Assistant United States Attorney for defendants-appellees James Black and Larry Webster. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding. D.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.