Public Utility District No. 1 Of Snohomish County v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.

Good Law
384 F.3d 756·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19045
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 200403-55191California2,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

384 F.3d 756 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DYNEGY POWER MARKETING, INC.; Reliant Energy Services, Inc.; Sempra Energy Trading Corp.; Sempra Energy Resources; Mirant Corporation; William Energy Marketing & Trading Company; Powerex Corporation; XCEL Energy, Inc.; NRG Energy, Inc.; Cabrillo Power I, LLC; Cabrillo Power II, LLC; El Segundo Power LLC; Long Beach Generation, LLC; PG & E Energy Trading Holding Corporation; Duke Energy Trading and Marketing LLC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-55191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 2004. Filed September 10, 2004. Steve W. Berman and Sean R. Matt, Hagens Berman LLP, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Terry J. Houlihan and Nora Cregan, Bingham McCutchen LLP, San Francisco, CA, Joel B. Kleinman, Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP, Washington, D.C., John M. Grenfell, Pillsbury Winthrop LLP, Peter H. Benzian, Latham & Watkins LLP, Jeffrey M. Shohet, Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich, LLP, San Diego, CA, Theodore Spanos, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Bryan A. Merryman, White…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.