Phiffer v. Columbia River Correctional Institute

Good Law
384 F.3d 791·2004 WL 2093450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 200401-35984California1,121 words

Opinion

Opinion

384 F.3d 791 Billy Ray PHIFFER, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COLUMBIA RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, a State of Oregon Public Entity; Santiam Correctional Institute, a State of Oregon public entity, Defendants-Appellants. No. 01-35984. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Resubmitted September 3, 2004. Filed September 13, 2004. Amended September 21, 2004. Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, State of Oregon, for the defendants-appellants. Dawna F. Scott, Lake Oswego, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV-01-01652-AJB. Before O'SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge O'Scannlain ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION PER CURIAM. ORDER 1 The per curiam opinion filed on September 13, 2004, is amended to include a concurrence by Judge O'Scannlain. OPINION 2 On April 21, 2003, we filed a memorandum in this case. 63 Fed.Appx. 335 (9th Cir.2003). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2386 , 158 L.Ed.2d 960 (2004), and vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Tennessee v. Lane, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 1978 , 158 L.Ed.2d 820 (2004). Upon due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.