The Cetacean Community v. George W. Bush, President of the United States of America Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States of America Secretary of Defense

Caution
386 F.3d 1169·2004 WL 2348373·34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20120·59 ERC (BNA) 1257·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21754
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 200403-15866California4,501 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

We are asked to decide whether the world’s cetaceans have standing to bring suit in their own name under the Endangered Species Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the National Environmental Protection Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act. We hold that cetaceans do not have standing under these statutes.

I. Background

The sole plaintiff in this case is the Cetacean Community (“Cetaceans”). The Cetacean Community is the name chosen by the Cetaceans’ self-appointed attorney for all of the world’s whales, porpoises, and dolphins. The Cetaceans challenge the United States Navy’s use of Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System Low Frequency Active Sonar (“SURTASS LFAS”) during wartime or heightened threat conditions. The Cetaceans allege that the Navy has violated, or will violate, the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544 , the Marine Mammal Protection Act (“MMPA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1371 -1421h, and the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347 .

The Navy has developed SURTASS LFAS to assist in detecting quiet submarines at long range. This sonar has both active and passive components. The active component consists of low frequency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.