Darquea

Darquea v. Baev CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 2022A165824California1,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining property on a hillside in San Jose. Defendants’ property is downslope from plaintiffs’ property. A concrete retaining wall separates the properties. In 2017, plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants alleging claims for nuisance, negligence, and declaratory and injunctive relief. According to the complaint, defendants planted trees abutting the wall; these trees blocked plaintiffs’ view and compromised the structural integrity of the wall. The complaint also alleged defendants damaged the wall by cutting into the concrete footing. Plaintiffs sought damages, a judicial declaration of the parties’ rights and responsibilities regarding the trees and the wall, and an order requiring defendants to remove the trees and repair the wall. In May 2018 — and before defendants answered the complaint — the parties mediated their dispute and entered into a settlement agreement. The agreement requires defendants to hire a structural engineer to inspect the retaining wall “and prepare a report on the fixes necessary to ensure the wall’s structural integrity.” The parties will share the cost of repairing “structural issues” but must bear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.