In Re Focus Media Inc., Debtor, Thomas E. Rubin v. John P. Pringle, Chapter 7 Trustee

Good Law
387 F.3d 1077·2004 WL 2435496·43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 227·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22713
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200403-55858California3,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Silverman, J.

We hold today that in an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court, a lawyer can be deemed to be the client’s implied agent to receive service of process when the lawyer repeatedly represented that client in the underlying bankruptcy case, and where the totality of the circumstances demonstrates the intent of the client to convey such authority. We also hold that Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 , 119 S.Ct. 1961 , 144 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999), does not bar the issuance of a preliminary injunction freezing assets where fraudulent conveyance or equitable causes of action are pleaded in the bankruptcy context.

I. Facts

On October 6, 2000, an involuntary bankruptcy case was filed against Focus Media, Inc., and John Pringle was appoint ed trustee. On January 3, 2002, Pringle brought an adversary proceeding against Thomas Rubin, the sole shareholder of Focus Media. The complaint alleged that Focus Media transferred approximately $20 million to Rubin in 2000, and further that Focus Media granted millions of dollars in unpaid loans to Rubin in 1999 and 2000. Pringle alleged that Rubin had used these funds in part to pay his personal taxes.

On the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.