May Trucking Company v. Oregon Department of Transportation

Good Law
388 F.3d 1261·2004 WL 2567113·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23768
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 200403-35381California6,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

In this case of first impression, we hold that the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341 , applies to the International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA), a multi-jurisdic-tional taxation program in which one state collects taxes imposed by other states. We further hold that a taxpayer has a “plain, speedy and efficient remedy” within the meaning of the Tax Injunction Act so long as it may obtain a full and fair hearing in the courts of the state whose tax that taxpayer challenges. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court, which held that the Tax Injunction Act deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction to hear this claim that IFTA precludes Oregon’s collection of certain fuel taxes.

BACKGROUND

A. Oregon’s participation in IFTA

The International Fuel Tax Agreement is a “multi-jurisdictional agreement that is intended to ‘encourage cooperation in the administration and collection of motor fuel use tax.’ ” Hi-Way Dispatch, Inc. v. Ind. Dep’t of State Revenue, 756 N.E.2d 587, 594 (Ind. T.C.2001) (quoting Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass’n v. State, 725 N.E.2d 891, 892 (Ind.Ct.App.2000)). IFTA itself imposes no taxes. “Rather, its member jurisdictions impose the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.