Price v. City Of Stockton

Good Law
390 F.3d 1105·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24995
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 200402-16155California6,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

390 F.3d 1105 Richard PRICE; Dwain Henderson; Lucinda Watson; George Baker; Lance White; Stanford Cobbs; Stockton Metro Ministry, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF STOCKTON; Stockton City Council; Stockton Redevelopment Agency; Stockton Department of Housing and Redevelopment; Steve Pinkerton; Mark Lewis; Gary Podesto; Leslie Martin; Richard Nickerson; Larry Ruhstaller; Gary Giovanetti; Ann Johnston; Gloria Nomura, Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-16155. No. 02-16270. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued January 15, 2003. Resubmitted September 15, 2004. Filed December 6, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Rick W. Jarvis, Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, San Leandro, CA; Lee Rosenthal, Goldfarb & Lipman, Oakland, CA, for the defendants-appellants. Stephanie E. Haffner, California Rural Legal Assistance, Stockton, CA; Deborah Collins, California Affordable Housing Law Project of the Public Interest Law Project, Oakland, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-00065-LKK. Before: HUG, ALARCON, and GRABER,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.