Wolfe v. Strankman

Bad Law
392 F.3d 358·2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25776
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 200402-15720California4,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

392 F.3d 358 Burton H. WOLFE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary E. STRANKMAN; Alfred G. Chiantelli; David A. Garcia; Ronald E. Quidachay; Ronald M. George; Deborah Silva; Judicial Council of California; State of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-15720. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 2004. Filed December 14, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Brian J. Murray, Jones Day, Washington, D.C.; Burton H. Wolfe, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Jill Theresa Bowers, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA; Jonathan U. Lee, City Attorney's Office of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01047-SBA. Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. OPINION WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Burton Wolfe seeks a declaratory judgment that California's Vexatious Litigant Statute, Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 391-391.7, is unconstitutional. He also seeks injunctive relief barring enforcement of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.