Gausvik v. Perez

Good Law
392 F.3d 1006
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 200404-35130California1,382 words

Opinion

Opinion

392 F.3d 1006 Ralph GAUSVIK, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert Ricardo PEREZ, individually and his official capacity; Kenneth Badgley, individually, and his official capacity; Earl Tilley, individually, and his official capacity; City of Wenatchee, a municipal corporation; Wenatchee Municipal Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-35130. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted October 15, 2004. * Filed November 18, 2004. Ordered Published December 13, 2004. Tyler K. Firkins, Van Siclen, Stocks & Firkins, Auburn, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Patrick McMahon, Carlson, McMahon & Sealby, Wenatchee, WA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; Alan A. McDonald, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00071-AAM. Before: LAY, ** FERGUSON, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. LAY, Circuit Judge: 1 Ralph Gausvik brought suit against Officer Robert Perez, alleging that the latter had violated his civil rights during a sexual abuse investigation. On September 16, 2002, the district court found that Perez was not entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.