Smith v. City of Hemet

Good Law
394 F.3d 689·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 336
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 200502-56445California11,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

394 F.3d 689 Thomas SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HEMET, a municipal corporation; Hemet Police Department; Lee Evanson; Dave Quinn; Aaron Medina; Daniel Reinbolt; Trainer; Nate Miller; Peter Hewitt, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-56445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 14, 2004. Filed January 10, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert Mann, Esq. and Donald W. Cook, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Julie H. Biggs, City Attorney, Hemet, CA; Elizabeth R. Feffer, Esq., Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00811-VAP. Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, KLEINFELD, THOMAS, SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, PAEZ, BERZON, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge SILVERMAN. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 We took this case en banc to clarify the law regarding whether, under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 , 114 S.Ct. 2364 , 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), a §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.