Deqa Ahmad Haji Ali Madaar A. Osman Isack A. Osman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
394 F.3d 780·2005 WL 95729·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 965
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 19, 200503-71731California5,764 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Deqa Ahmad Haji Ali petitions on behalf of herself and her two sons, Madaar Osman and Isack Osman, for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Ali, Madaar, and Isack are all natives of Somalia. The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) dismissed Ali’s asylum claim based on findings that: (1) she had failed to establish that her past persecution was on account of an enumerated ground; and (2) that Ali and her sons had firmly resettled in Ethiopia prior to entering the United States. The IJ granted Ali and her two sons voluntary departure to Somalia in lieu of removal. The BIA affirmed the decision of the IJ without opinion. We find Ali statutorily eligible for asylum and remand for an exercise of discretion on the asylum claim and for further consideration of the withholding of removal claims.

I. Factual and Procedural History

A. Ali’s Experiences in Somalia

Ali, the lead petitioner, was born in Berbera, a northern Somali city, and is a member of the Muuse Diriiye clan, which is referred to pejoratively as the Midgan clan. Muuse Diriiye clan members are bound…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.