John K. Henderson v. Robert O. Lampert

Good Law
396 F.3d 1049·2005 WL 181879·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1413
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 200503-35738California3,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

State prisoner Henderson appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his habeas petition. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , and we have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . Because the petition raises the same claims Henderson raised in an earlier petition that was dismissed on grounds of state procedural default, and because he cannot now challenge the grounds on which the first petition was dismissed, the current petition is a “second or successive” petition barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(1). We therefore affirm.

I.

In 1990, Henderson pled guilty to murder in Oregon state court. Believing that it was without discretion to do otherwise, the state court sentenced Henderson to 121 months in accordance with his plea agreement. However, after conducting further research, the state court judge concluded that he could have imposed a higher sentence. He therefore, on his own motion, ordered Henderson and the prosecutor back into court, vacated the sentence, and reassigned the case to another judge for resentencing.

Henderson filed a motion seeking reinstatement of the 121-month sentence. The court (with a new judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.