United States v. Clydell Younger

Caution
398 F.3d 1179·2005 WL 466201·66 Fed. R. Serv. 726·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3438
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 200504-10206California4,620 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

Clydell Younger appeals his jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), and for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Defendant asserts that (1) the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements; (2) the district court erred in permitting certain expert opinion testimony; (3) the prosecutors engaged in prejudicial misconduct during closing argument; (4) the Second Amendment bars prosecution for felon in possession; and (5) the evidence failed to satisfy the “interstate commerce” element of the felon-in-possession charge.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I. Facts

On November 18, 2002, police officers Hall and Benzinger, assisted by other officers, executed a warrant to séarch defendant’s person, residence, and vehicle. The warrant was based on information Hall and Benzinger received from a confidential informant that defendant was selling crack cocaine from his residence.

After knocking and announcing their presence, the officers heard loud thumps of someone running inside the residence, and forced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.