James Morrison v. Michael Mahoney, Warden, Montana State Prison

Good Law
399 F.3d 1042·2005 WL 418563·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3130
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 200503-35161California2,312 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

James Morrison (“Morrison”) appeals the denial of his habeas petition by the district court" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Morrison contends that the district court erred in finding that various of his habeas claims were barred by procedural default. He asserts that the appel-lee, Michael Mahoney, the warden of the Montana State Prison (“the State”), waived this defense by failing to raise it in a timely manner. In addition, Morrison has filed a motion to this court to broaden the Certificate of Appealability (“COA”) to include the issue of whether the state trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to; counsel by failing to properly investigate his complaints about his trial counsel. We haye jurisdiction under 28 U.S-C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm the district court’s denial of the habeas petition, and deny Morrison’s motion to broaden the COA. - .

I. BACKGROUND

A State trial court proceedings

On September 18, 1990, Morrison was charged with having sexual intercourse without consent in violation of Mont.Code Ann. § 45-5-503. During the ■ arraignment, the court appointed counsel for Morrison. On October 29, 1990, Morrison wrote a letter to the trial judge, requesting new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.