United States v. John A. Hickey, United States of America v. John A. Hickey

Good Law
400 F.3d 658·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3808
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 200502-10197California219 words

Opinion

Opinion

400 F.3d 658 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. HICKEY, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. Hickey, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-10197. No. 02-10204. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 13, 2004. Filed April 30, 2004. Amended March 8, 2005. David J. Cohen, Cohen & Paik, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellant. Robin Harris, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-97-00218-MMC. Before WALLACE, McKEOWN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 1 The opinion is amended as follows: (a) the paragraph in section V that begins "Hickey's arguments meet none of the criteria" is deleted; (b) the first word of the next paragraph is deleted so that the sentence reads "The district court did not resolve an `important issue'"; and (c) the following footnote is inserted at the end of the sentence: 2 We need not decide whether Hickey's challenge to the indictments has been "conclusively determined," because, as we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.