Motley v. Parks

Good Law
401 F.3d 1030·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4561
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 200502-56648California192 words

Opinion

Opinion

401 F.3d 1030 Darla MOTLEY; Juan Jamerson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernard PARKS; Daryl Gates; Gerald Chaleff; Herbert Boeckman; T. Warren Jackson; Robert M. Talcott; Raymond C. Fisher; Guadalupe Sanchez; Gregory Kading; Al Ruegg; James Black; Lawrence Webster; Dean Hansell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-56648. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 21, 2005. Stephen Yagman, Esq., Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, Kathryn S. Bloomfield, Esq., Stephen Yagman, Esq., Yagman & Yagman & Reichmann, Venice Beach, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Kathryn S. Bloomfield, Esq., Janet G. Bogigian, Deputy City Attorney, Christian R. Bojorquez, Elizabeth A. Keech, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General (LA), David Pinchas, Esq., USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees. Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.