Leslie J. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., a Corporation Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., Individually and as Successor to the American Tobacco Company and Its Predecessor in Interest, British American Tobacco Industries, Plc, Maria Cannata v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc., AKA Philip Morris Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

Good Law
403 F.3d 631·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4956
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 200503-55780California5,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

403 F.3d 631 Leslie J. GRISHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., individually and as successor to the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC, Defendants-Appellees. Maria Cannata, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., aka Philip Morris; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-55780. No. 03-56018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 29, 2005. Frances M. Phares, Esq., Baum Hedlund, Los Angeles, CA, Martin Louis Stanley, Esq., Santa Monica, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Daniel U. Smith, Esq., Law Office of Daniel U. Smith, Kentfield, CA, Murray R. Garnick, Sheila B. Scheuerman, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC, Maurice A. Leiter, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, Daniel P. Collins, Esq., Ralph A. Campillo, Esq., Sedgwick Detert Moran & Arnold, Amy W. Schulman, Fred D. Heather, Esq., Piper Rudnick, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee. Before: FARRIS, D.W. NELSON, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM: 1 We certify to the California Supreme Court the questions set forth in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.