Canatella v. California
Opinion
Opinion
404 F.3d 1106 Richard A. CANATELLA, Plaintiff, and Randy E. Bendel, Intervenor-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA; Board of Governors of the State Bar of California; President of the State Bar Association; The Judges of the State Bar Court; and The Office of the Chief Counsel of the State Bar of California, Defendants, and Ronald W. Stovitz; Judith A. Epstein; Madge S. Watai; Richard A. Honn; Patrice E. McElroy; Alban I. Niles; Joann M. Remke; Robert M. Talcott; James E. Herman; and Michael Nisperos, Jr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-15306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted October 6, 2004. * Filed April 11, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Randy E. Bendel, Esq., Woodland Hills, CA, intervenor-appellant, Pro Se. Jay M. Goldman, Office of the General Counsel, The State Bar of California, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01105-MJJ. Before HALL, BRUNETTI, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge. 1 California attorney Randy E. Bendel appeals the denial of his motion to intervene as a…