Tanadgusix Corp. v. Huber

Good Law
404 F.3d 1201·2005 WL 913471·2005 A.M.C. 1307·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6831
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 200502-36142California3,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

404 F.3d 1201 TANADGUSIX CORPORATION; Bering Sea Eccotech, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dierdre HUBER, Director, Property Management Division, General Services Administration, in her official capacity; Stephen A. Perry, Administrator, General Services Administration, in his official capacity; Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, Small Business Administration, in his official capacity; United States of America; James Jobkar, Alaska Department of Administration, Division of General Services, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-36142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 7, 2004. Filed April 21, 2005. Thomas P. Schlosser, Morisset, Schlosser, Jozwiak & McGaw, Seattle, WA, for the appellants. Marjorie L. Vandor (briefed), Assistant Attorney General, Alaska Department of Law, Juneau, AK, for appellee James Jobkar, Alaska Department of Administration. Thomas M. Bondy, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the federal appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-00032-A-RRB. Before: HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.