California Scents v. Surco Products, Inc.

Good Law
406 F.3d 1102·2005 WL 1053020
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 200503-56116California3,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

406 F.3d 1102 CALIFORNIA SCENTS, aka California Scents, Inc., Plaintiff-counter defendant-Appellant, v. SURCO PRODUCTS, INC., aka Doe 1; Magic Mountain Products, aka Doe 2; Odor Control Central, aka Doe 3, Defendants, Associated Products, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation; Ralph J. Simons, Counter-defendants, and Pestco, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation dba Pacific Coast; Air-Scent International, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellees. No. 03-56116. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 8, 2005. Filed May 6, 2005. Steven Brower (argued) and Robert M. Dato (briefed), Stephan, Oringher, Richman & Theodora, Costa Mesa, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Richard A. Ejzak, Cohen & Grigsby, Pittsburgh, PA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-00009-GLT. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, JR., Circuit Judges, and REED, JR., * District Judge. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. 1 When plaintiff California Scents filed its complaint it did not demand a jury trial. Defendant Pestco answered, filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.