Diane M. Hendricks Kenneth A. Hendricks v. Bank of America, N.A., and Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd., a Bermuda Corporation

Good Law
408 F.3d 1127·2005 WL 1217391·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9442
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 200503-55754California5,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

ORDER

The court’s opinion filed February 25, 2005, slip op. 2209, and appearing at 398 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir.2005), is hereby amended as follows:

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.. Judge McKeown has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wallace and Judge Noonan so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

AMENDED OPINION

Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd., the defendant in the trial court (Mutual), appeals from a district court order enjoining co-defendant Bank of America, N.A. (Bank) from honoring Mutual’s efforts to draw down on a letter of credit (LOC) posted by Diane and Kenneth Hendricks, the trial court plaintiffs (the Hendricks). We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s preliminary injunction order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm.

I.

The Hendricks own American Patriot Insurance Agency,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.