Cleghorn v. Blue Shield Of California

Good Law
408 F.3d 1222·34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2898·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9348
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 200503-55528California2,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

408 F.3d 1222 Douglas D. CLEGHORN, individually, on behalf of other similarly-situated persons and on behalf of the public, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, dba CareAmerica, Defendant-Appellee. No. 03-55528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 10, 2005. Filed May 23, 2005. Sharon J. Arkin, Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson, Newport Beach, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Gregory N. Pimstone, Terri D. Keville, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-00852-DOC. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. CANBY, Circuit Judge: 1 We are presented once again with a question concerning the degree to which the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") preempts state law. Douglas D. Cleghorn is a participant in his employer's ERISA health plan offered by Blue Shield of California (doing business as CareAmerica) ("Blue Shield"). On one occasion he sought and received emergency medical services and Blue Shield denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.