United States v. 144,774 pounds of Blue King Crab

Good Law
410 F.3d 1131·2005 WL 1355511·35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20113·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 10699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 200503-36006California2,803 words

Opinion

Opinion

410 F.3d 1131 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Deep Sea Fisheries Inc; Deep Sea Harvester, Inc., Claimants-Appellants, and John R. Boggs, President Deep Sea Fisheries Inc.; Global Fishing Inc, a Washington Corporation; Kamchatcomagroprombank, a Russian Chartered Bank, Claimants, v. 144,774 POUNDS OF BLUE KING CRAB, more or less, Defendant. No. 03-36006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 2, 2005. Filed June 9, 2005. John M. Colvin, Chicoine & Hallett, P.S., Seattle, WA, for the claimants-appellants. John McKay, Peter O. Mueller, and Richard E. Cohen, United States Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; John C. Coughenour, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-02167-JCC. Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge. 1 King crab taken in violation of Russian fishing regulations is subject to forfeiture under the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3374 (a), on a strict liability basis. The question before us is whether an importer of such crab may assert an "innocent owner defense" in forfeiture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.