ARC Ecology v. U.S. Dept. of Air Force

Good Law
411 F.3d 1092·2005 WL 1398736·35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20123·60 ERC (BNA) 1614·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11242
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 200504-15031California5,818 words

Opinion

Opinion

411 F.3d 1092 ARC ECOLOGY; Filipino/American Coalition for Environmental Solutions; Norma Duero; Noel Duero; Maritess Duero; Victoria N. Maniago; Maritess Balintag; Elsa E. Gonzaga; Melody O'Brien; Connie R. Domdom; Rosalina Geronimo; Alma G. Balawan; Rosalinda I. Peraan; Zenaida A. Riley; Marissa C. Navidad; Dolores C. Mose; Adriano B. Lazarte; Loita Sayat; Francisca Smith; Edya P. Warner; Jennifer Lansangan; Angelica Warner; Crispin Diala; Christina Munoz; Fernando Ferrer; Hilaria Ferrer; Emilio Ferrer; Ria Richelle Limid; Gilbert Pineda; Felipe Espinosa, Jr.; Ramil Espinosa; Mario Manialung; Betty B. Valencia; Angelina M. Liwanag; Mary Ann V. Diego; Ernesto S. Borja; Ofelia M. Dizon; Nerminda B. Sagum, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; United States Department of the Navy; United States Department of Defense; Donald Rumsfeld, in his capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-15031. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 11, 2005. Filed June 15, 2005. Scott J. Allen, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Todd S. Kim (argued), Martin F. McDermott, and David C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.