City of Arcadia v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
411 F.3d 1103·2005 WL 1398829·35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20122·60 ERC (BNA) 1674·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11240
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 200503-16309California1,653 words

Opinion

Opinion

411 F.3d 1103 CITY OF ARCADIA; City of Baldwin Park; City of Bellflower; City of Cerritos; City of Commerce; City of Diamond Bar; City of Downey; City of Irwindale; City of Lawndale; City of Monrovia; City of Montebello; City of Monterey Park; City of Pico Rivera; City of Rosemead; City of San Gabriel; City of Sante Fe Springs; City of Sierra Madre; City of Signal Hill; City of South Pasadena; City of Vernon; City of West Covina; City of Whittier, a California Municipal Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Christine Todd Whitman, USEPA Administrator; Wayne Nastri, USEPA Region IX Administrator, Defendants-Appellees, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.; Heal the Bay, Inc.; Santa Monica Baykeeper, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 03-16309. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 10, 2005. Filed June 15, 2005. Richard Montevideo, Terence J. Gallagher, Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. John A. Bryson, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the defendants-appellees. David S. Beckman, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Santa Monica, CA, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.