In Re Kevin J. Doser in Re Laura E. Doser, Judith M. Scott v. United States Trustee

Good Law
412 F.3d 1056·2005 WL 1413520·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11558
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 200503-35411California3,871 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

We hold today that when enacting 11 U.S.C. § 110 , Congress acted within its power under Article I, section 8, clause 4 of the United States Constitution. We further hold that § 110 is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad and that it does not violate the First Amendment. Finally, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s findings that Judith Scott violated § 110 by engaging in deceptive or unfair conduct and by charging excessive fees. However, we express no opinion on whether Scott engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, whether the unauthorized practice of law itself is a violation of § 110, or whether the unauthorized practice of law constitutes fraudulent, deceptive or unfair conduct under § 110.

I

BACKGROUND

A. Facts

Appellant Judith Scott is a franchisee of We The People Forms and Service Centers USA, Inc. (We the People or Franchisor). Scott is not an attorney, but is a bankruptcy petition preparer (BPP) within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 110 . Kevin and Laura Doser’s bankruptcy petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code was prepared by Scott. When a customer decides to use Scott’s services, the customer signs a “purchase order,” which the Dos-ers did. The customer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.