United States v. Gonzalez, Inc. Dba Golden State Transportation

Good Law
412 F.3d 1102·2005 WL 1459569·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11953
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 200504-10041California6,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

The government appeals the district court order granting in part defendants’ motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of wiretaps at the Los Angeles headquarters of Gonzalez, Inc., dba Golden State Transportation (GST). We consider below whether the district court erred by: (1) conducting a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); (2) finding that the wiretap issued for the company headquarters failed to meet the statutory necessity requirement; and (3) granting standing to Antonio and Francisco Gonzalez to challenge all conversations intercepted under the invalidated wiretap order. We conclude that each of the district court’s rulings was correct, and thus we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This appeal involves a multi-year investigation into an alleged conspiracy to smuggle aliens into the United States using a public bus company, GST. Although the government received and acted upon reports of alien smuggling at GST as early as May 1996, a sustained federal investigation into the alleged smuggling ring facilitated by GST did not begin until 1999. At that time, GST had bus terminals in nine western…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.