Berg v. Popham

Good Law
412 F.3d 1122·2005 WL 1490472·35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20136·60 ERC (BNA) 1838·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 12412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 200501-35807California3,978 words

Opinion

Opinion

412 F.3d 1122 David BERG; Marge Berg, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David POPHAM; Tsukiko Popham, Defendants, and Norge Corporation, and its successors in interest; Magic Chef Corporation; Maytag Corporation; ABC Inc.; ABC Co.; ABC Corp., Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-35807. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued August 7, 2002. Submission Withdrawn October 4, 2002. Resubmitted June 16, 2005. Filed June 24, 2005. Michael W. Flanigan, Walther & Flanigan, Anchorage, AK, for the plaintiffs-appellants. I. Franklin Hunsaker, Bullivant Houser Bailey, Portland, OR, Christopher W. Angius, Holland & Knight LLP, Portland, OR, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00151-JWS. Before: B. FLETCHER, ARTHUR L. ALARCÓN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 This matter is before us to review the Alaska state law questions presented by the parties to this dispute. 1 This appeal presents a novel issue under Alaska law, i.e., is an entity subject to liability under Alaska Statute ("AS") § 46.03.822(a)(4) if it manufactured…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.