Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Ryan

Good Law
415 F.3d 986·2005 WL 1593466·35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20142·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13570
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 200503-16940California3,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

415 F.3d 986 HOOPA VALLEY INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. RYAN, Northern Area Manager, Bureau of Reclamation; Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-16940. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 2005. Filed July 8, 2005. Kyme A.M. McGaw, Thomas P. Schlosser, Morisset, Schlosser, Jozwiak, & McGaw, Seattle, WA, for the appellant. John S. Koppel, Attorney, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Samuel Conti, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-00041-SC. Before HUG, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. HUG, Circuit Judge. 1 In an effort to address ongoing declines in salmon and steelhead populations in the Trinity River basin, the Bureau of Reclamation adopted a multifaceted restoration program. The Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe sought funding to implement many of the proposed restoration projects under the mandatory contracting provisions of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act. After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.