Doe v. Mann
Opinion
Opinion
415 F.3d 1038 Mary DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur MANN, in his official capacity; Robert L. Crone, Jr., in his official capacity; Lake County Superior Court; Department of Social Services, Lake County; D., Mrs.; D., Mr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-15477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 6, 2004. Filed July 19, 2005. Marc A. Le Forestier, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Sacramento, CA; Cameron L. Reeves, County Counsel, Robert L. Weiss, Deputy County Counsel, Lake County, Lakeport, CA, Alicia C. Park, Soter & Park, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Caroline J. Todd, Berkeley, CA, for intervenor-appellee Jane Doe. Bertram E. Hirsch, Great Neck, NY, for amici Association on American Indian Affairs, National Indian Child Welfare Association, and Tanana Chiefs Conference. Thomas Weathers, Alexander, Berkey, Williams & Weathers, Berkley, CA, for amicus Morongo Band of Mission Indians. Brad S. Jolly, Smith & Jolly, Thornton, CO, for amicus Elem Indian Colony. John W. Corbett, Klamath, CA, for amicus Yurok Tribe. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern…