Doe v. Mann

Bad Law
415 F.3d 1038·2005 WL 1668819·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14544
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 200504-15477California17,227 words

Opinion

Opinion

415 F.3d 1038 Mary DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur MANN, in his official capacity; Robert L. Crone, Jr., in his official capacity; Lake County Superior Court; Department of Social Services, Lake County; D., Mrs.; D., Mr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-15477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 6, 2004. Filed July 19, 2005. Marc A. Le Forestier, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, Sacramento, CA; Cameron L. Reeves, County Counsel, Robert L. Weiss, Deputy County Counsel, Lake County, Lakeport, CA, Alicia C. Park, Soter & Park, Attorneys at Law, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Caroline J. Todd, Berkeley, CA, for intervenor-appellee Jane Doe. Bertram E. Hirsch, Great Neck, NY, for amici Association on American Indian Affairs, National Indian Child Welfare Association, and Tanana Chiefs Conference. Thomas Weathers, Alexander, Berkey, Williams & Weathers, Berkley, CA, for amicus Morongo Band of Mission Indians. Brad S. Jolly, Smith & Jolly, Thornton, CO, for amicus Elem Indian Colony. John W. Corbett, Klamath, CA, for amicus Yurok Tribe. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.