United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-Preciado, AKA Tony Rodriguez-Preciado
416 F.3d 939·2005 WL 1792061·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15597
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 200503-30285California105 words
Opinion
ORDER
The court’s majority opinion filed March 4, 2005, slip op. 2539, and appearing at 399 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir.2005), is hereby amended as follows:
We now address the impact of the recent en banc decision in United States v. Ame line, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) on this case. Because we cannot “reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we will remand to the sentencing court to answer that question.” Id. at 1084 . The mandate shall issue forthwith.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART.