Warren

Warren v. Harris CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 2022E076717California713 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/8/22 Warren v. Harris CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

COURTNEY WARREN,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E076717

v. (Super.Ct.No. CVSW2100791)

DAVID HARRIS, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Jeffrey M. Zimel, Judge.

Affirmed.

David Harris, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 David Harris appeals a restraining order against him requiring him to stay away 1 from his neighbor, Courtney Warren, for three years. Harris, who represents himself on

appeal as he did in the trial court, argues we must reverse the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.