Mackinga

Mackinga v. Mackinga CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 2022B314989California2,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/8/22 Mackinga v. Mackinga CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

KELLY MACKINGA, 2d Civil No. B314989 (Super. Ct. No. 17FLP-0313) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

DARREL MACKINGA,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appellant Kelly Mackinga appeals from the order renewing a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO). (Fam. Code, § 6300 et seq.) She contends the trial court abused its discretion when it excluded her minor children as protected parties.1 We affirm.

1 Respondent has not filed a responsive brief. Accordingly, we “decide the appeal on the record, the opening brief, and any oral argument by the appellant.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.220(a)(2).)

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.