United States v. Michael Emmett Beck

Good Law
418 F.3d 1008·2005 WL 1876284·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16713
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 200503-30470California3,596 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Michael Beck appeals several rulings of the district court made during his trial for bank robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). The district court denied Beck’s pre-trial motions to exclude evidence of photograph identification and in- court eyewitness identification of Beck, and also to prevent Beck’s probation officer from giving lay opinion testimony identifying Beck as the person in the bank’s surveillance photograph. Beck also appeals the district court’s denial of his trial motion to exclude the government from presenting rebuttal testimony of an FBI agent. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a)(1), and we affirm.

I

On May 1, 2000, a man approached a teller window at the Lloyd Center Tower branch of Key Bank, located in Portland, Oregon. Shantina Green was the teller at the window. The man handed Green a note, and told her that he had a gun and would kill her. The man told Green to give him cash in fifty and one-hundred dollar bills, and not to give him any tracking device. Green said that she did not have fifty or one-hundred dollar bills, and the man told her to give him whatever she had. Green complied and the man walked away. Green…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.