Friendly House v. Napolitano

Good Law
419 F.3d 930·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 200505-15005California577 words

Opinion

Opinion

419 F.3d 930 FRIENDLY HOUSE; Samuel U. Chavira; Tammy Gregoire; Julia V., by and through his guardian ad litem; V. Beto; Marisol C., by and through their guardian ad litem; Adan C.; Francisco C.; Alejandra C.; Lucy A.; Joaquin G., by and through their guardian ad litem; Manuel G.; Jose G.; Maria S., by and through their guardian ad litem; Sergio S.; Juanita S.; Nathan S.; Marco S.; Claudia S.; Lydia Hernandez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona; Jan Brewer, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arizona; David A. Berns, Director of the Arizona Dept. of Economic Security, Defendants-Appellees, Yes on Proposition 200; Randy Pullen; Federation for American Immigration Reform; Kathy McKee; Claudia Bloom, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 05-15005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 2005. Filed August 9, 2005. Hector O. Villagra, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Mary O'Grady, Office of Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendants-appellees. Edmond D. Kahn, Tucson, AZ, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.