United States v. Koran McKinley Allen, A/K/A Sinbad

Good Law
425 F.3d 1231·2005 WL 2649459·68 Fed. R. Serv. 661·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 200504-50205California2,334 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

A jury convicted Koran McKinley Allen of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, armed bank robbery, and using, carrying, or possessing a firearm during a crime of violence. On appeal, Allen maintains that there was insufficient evidence to support his firearm conviction; that the admission of a co-conspirator’s statement violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation; that a government witness’s allusion to Allen’s previous incarceration warranted a mistrial; that the district court failed to appreciate that it had discretion to depart downward on Allen’s sentence based on a tragic personal history and the disproportionate impact of a prior conviction; and that the enhancement of his sentence using judge-found facts violated the Sixth Amendment. We affirm the convictions and, because the sentencing judge is no longer available, we order a remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), and United States v. Sanders, 421 F.3d 1044, 1052 (9th Cir.2005).

I

BACKGROUND

Allen and his co-conspirators robbed the Community Bank in Pasadena, California, of $21,619. The plan was organized by Larry Washington and his longtime…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.