James Fields v. Palmdale School District (Psd)

Good Law
427 F.3d 1197·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23643
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200503-56499California7,153 words

Opinion

Opinion

427 F.3d 1197 James FIELDS; Tammany Fields; Stuart Haberman; Robert Hoaglin; Kathie Hoaglin; Vanessa Shetler, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PALMDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT (PSD); Michael Geisser; Arland Atwood, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-56499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 2, 2005. Filed November 2, 2005. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Erik Gunderson, Esq., Steven C. Shonack, Esq., Gunderson, Schlichter, Shonack & Handel, LLP, Manhattan Beach, CA; Duane L. Bartsch, Esq., Law Offices of Duane Bartsch, Manhattan Beach, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Dennis J. Walsh, Esq., Douglas Lyon, Esq., Law Offices of Dennis J. Walsh, APC, Encino, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-00457-JVS. Before: LAY, * REINHARDT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 When parents of schoolchildren in Palmdale, California learned from their sons and daughters that they had been questioned in their public elementary school about sexual topics such as the frequency of "thinking about having sex" and "thinking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.