Neama El Sayed Ramadan Gasser Hisham El Gendy v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Good Law
427 F.3d 1218·2005 WL 2862096·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23645
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200503-74351California2,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hawkins, J.

In an issue of first impression in this circuit, we address the effect of the recently passed REAL ID Act, Pub L. No. 109-13 § 106(a) (2005), on our jurisdiction to review an agency decision under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2). In this case, the immigration judge (“IJ”) determined that the petitioner was ineligible to apply for asylum because the asylum application was not filed within one year after the last entry into the United States (the “one-year bar”) and that there were no “changed circumstances” that materially affected the petitioner’s eligibility for asylum. We conclude that such a determination is essentially factual, and thus not a “question of law” within the meaning of the REAL ID Act. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review any claim regarding the petitioner’s asylum application, and deny the petition as it pertains to withholding of removal.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Lead petitioner Neama El Sayed Ramadan (“Ramadan”) was born in Egypt. She attended the University of Alexandria and obtained degrees in physical education and rhythmic gymnastics. She taught gymnastics at the University, and also taught aerobics at a private athletic club in Alexandria, near her home.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.