Clare Milne, by and Through Michael Joseph Coyne, Her Receiver v. Stephen Slesinger, Inc.

Good Law
430 F.3d 1036·2005 WL 3312753·77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1281·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 26853
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 200504-57189California6,345 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

This copyright action arises from a termination notice sent by the appellant to the appellee, seeking to recapture rights to various characters created by her grandfather, Alan Alexander Milne, who authored the “Winnie-the-Pooh” children’s books. Milne originally granted various rights in those works to the appellee in 1930. Then, in 1983, due to a change in copyright law in 1976, Milne’s heirs considered terminating the 1930 grant outright, but instead entered into a new agreement that revoked the original grant and re-issued rights in the works to the appellee. The appellant seeks to invalidate the 1983 agreement based on 1998 legislation. The 1998 legislation only authorizes the termination of copyright agreements executed before 1978. Because the 1983 revocation and re-grant were valid, we affirm the district court’s decision.

I

A. Historical & Regulatory Background

As part of the enumerated powers vested in the federal government, the Constitution provides Congress with the power “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” U.S. Const, art. I, §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.