Victor B. Valencia v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Good Law
431 F.3d 673·2005 WL 3358678
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 200503-72028California2,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. The opinion filed on May 12, 2005, and reported at 406 F.3d 1154 , is hereby withdrawn, and re placed by the. opinion filed concurrently with this order. Further petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc will be accepted, and the time for filing petitions for rehearing shall run anew commencing on the filed date of the substituted opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 40(a)(1) and 35(c).

OPINION

Victor Valencia, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. Valencia was convicted of felony unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under eighteen, who was more than three years younger than he, in violation of California Penal Code section 261.5(c). The IJ found Valencia removable for having committed an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii), holding the crime constituted a crime of violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(F), which defines a crime of violence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 16 . Our jurisdiction is controlled by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.