United States v. Blaine Travis Fifield

Good Law
432 F.3d 1056·2005 WL 3556912·2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 29011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 200504-30299California4,809 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

Blaine Fifield pleaded guilty to one count of felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), and one count of unlawful user of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(3). The district court sentenced him to fifty-four months imprisonment on each count. The court ordered that these sentences run concurrently with each other but consecutively to two sentences imposed previously by a Montana state court.

On appeal, Fifield presents three questions relating to the district court’s decision to make the federal sentences run consecutively to the state sentences. First, he argues that under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32, he was entitled to specific notice that the district court was considering ordering the sentences to run consecutively. Second, he contends that the district court violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 3584 and 3553 by failing to state in open court its reasons for deciding to run the sentences consecutively. Third, he maintains that the decision to run the sentences consecutively violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial because the decision was based on facts that were neither found by a jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.