Hugh Hardage v. Cbs Broadcasting Inc.

Good Law
433 F.3d 672·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 268
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 200619-70137California273 words

Opinion

Opinion

433 F.3d 672 Hugh HARDAGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CBS BROADCASTING INC., a New York Corporation; Viacom Television Stations Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Viacom Broadcasting of Seattle Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Kathy Sparks, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-35906. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005. Filed November 1, 2005. Amended January 6, 2006. Claudia Kilbreath, Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Harry J.F. Korrell and Kathryn S. Loppnow, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Western District of Washington; John C. Coughenour, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-01303-JCC. Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The panel opinion filed November 1, 2005, is amended as follows: Add to end of footnote 1 (p. 14898): 2 The dissent also analyzes the potential legal effect of EEOC enforcement guidance. This guidance was never cited by Hardage in any of his briefs. "Our circuit has repeatedly admonished that we cannot `manufacture arguments for an appellant' and therefore we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.