Carson Harbor Village v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
433 F.3d 1260·2006 WL 62299·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20011·61 ERC (BNA) 1833·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 674
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 200604-55024California4,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

433 F.3d 1260 CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, Ltd., a limited partnership dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; City of Compton; City of Carson, Defendants-counter-claimants, Carson Harbor Village Mobile Home Park, a California general partnership; Richard G. Braley; Walker Smith, Jr., Defendants-cross-claimants, and Unocal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-cross-claimant-Appellee. No. 04-55024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 17, 2005. Filed January 12, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas W. Casparian, Gilchrist & Rutter, Santa Monica, CA, and Chris M. Amantea, McDermott, Will & Emery, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellant. Kurt Weissmuller, Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava & MacCuish, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-96-03281-MMM. Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. HALL, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiff Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. (Carson Harbor) appeals the district court's grant of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.