Nopring Paulino Penuliar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Bad Law
435 F.3d 961·2006 WL 156849
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 200603-71578California4,093 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The Opinion filed January 12, 2005, slip op. 453, and appearing at 395 F.3d 1037 , is amended as follows:

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions shall be entertained.

OPINION

Nopring Paulino Penuliar petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Penuliar, a lawful permanent resident, pled guilty to two counts of unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle in violation of California Vehicle Code § 10851(a), and one count of evading an officer in violation of California Vehicle Code § 2800.2(a). Classifying both convictions as “aggravated felonies” under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), an Immigration Judge (“IJ”), affirmed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.