United States v. Craig Allen Ladwig

Good Law
435 F.3d 1147·2006 WL 211729·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 200604-30393California93 words

Opinion

ORDER

In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdiction and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Lad-wig’s sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehearing En Banc has expired.