Hugh Hardage v. Cbs Broadcasting Inc.

Good Law
436 F.3d 1050·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3009
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 200603-35906California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

436 F.3d 1050 Hugh HARDAGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CBS BROADCASTING INC., a New York Corporation; Viacom Television Stations Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Viacom Broadcasting of Seattle Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Kathy Sparks, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-35906. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005. Filed November 1, 2005. Amended January 6, 2006. Second Amendment February 8, 2006. Claudia Kilbreath, Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiff-appellant. Harry J. F. Korrell and Kathryn S. Loppnow, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, Washington, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-01303-JCC. Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The panel opinion filed January 6, 2006, is amended as follows: 2 Add as a new paragraph after footnote 1 (slip op. 82): 3 There may be circumstances where an employer's "remedial obligation kicks in," Fuller, 47 F.3d at 1528, regardless of the employee's stated wishes. In other words, the mere fact that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.