Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation v. Eileen M. Parker, AKA Eileen Marrero, Anita Pietrofitta Estate of Scott Parker, by and Through Its Personal Representative, and Zachary Dry, a Minor Child by and Through His Natural Mother and Guardian Lisa Dry, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation v. Eileen M. Parker, AKA Eileen Marrero, Anita Pietrofitta, and Zachary Dry, a Minor Child by and Through His Natural Mother and Guardian Lisa Dry Estate of Scott Parker, by and Through Its Personal Representative

Good Law
436 F.3d 1109·36 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2505·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2561
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 200603-16518California3,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

436 F.3d 1109 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Plaintiff, v. Eileen M. PARKER, aka Eileen Marrero, Defendant-Appellant, Anita Pietrofitta; Estate of Scott Parker, by and through its personal representative, Defendants-Appellees, and Zachary Dry, a minor child by and through his natural mother and guardian Lisa Dry, Defendant. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York corporation, Plaintiff, v. Eileen M. Parker, aka Eileen Marrero, Defendant-Appellee, Anita Pietrofitta, Defendant-Appellant, and Zachary Dry, a minor child by and through his natural mother and guardian Lisa Dry; Estate of Scott Parker, by and through its personal representative, Defendants. No. 03-16518. No. 03-16620. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 15, 2005. Filed February 2, 2006. Richard M. Waugh, Richard M. Waugh, Ltd., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant Eileen Marrero. Candess J. Hunter and Isabel M. Humphrey, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee/cross-appellant Anita Pietrofitta. David L. Haga and Jennifer R. Houde, Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee estate of Scott Parker. Kevin J. Parker, Snell &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.