Hale v. Norton

Good Law
437 F.3d 892·2006 WL 302462·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20037·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 200603-36032California1,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

437 F.3d 892 Robert HALE; Joshua Hale; Nava S. Sunstar; Butterfly Sunstar, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary of the Interior; Gary Candelaria, Superintendent, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Hunter Sharp, Chief Ranger, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Department of the Interior; National Park Service; Fran Mainella, Director of the National Park Service; Marcia Blaszak, Acting Regional Director of the National Park Service; all in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, National Parks Conservation Association; The Wilderness Society; Alaska Center for the Environment, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 03-36032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 2005. Filed February 9, 2006. Russell C. Brooks and James S. Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Matthew J. Sanders, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee. Robert W. Randall and Rebecca L. Bernard, Trustees for Alaska, Anchorage, AK, for the defendants-intervenors-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; Ralph…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.